Background
Endometrial cancer (EC), one of the most common cancers affecting women, has seen a significant rise in incidence over recent decades. Identifying modifiable risk factors is crucial for prevention strategies. A study examines the potential impact of sweetener consumption, both nutritional (e.g., sugar) and non-nutritional (e.g., artificial sweeteners), on the risk of developing EC.
Results
The meta-analysis included twelve studies, totaling ten cohort studies and two case-control studies. The findings revealed a higher incidence of EC among participants who consumed sweeteners, with a combined OR of 1.15. Notably, consumption of nutritional sweeteners was consistently associated with an increased risk of EC (OR = 1.25). In contrast, non-nutritional sweeteners did not show a significant association with EC risk, indicating no increased risk from these substances.
Subgroup Analysis
Detailed analysis further differentiated the effects of different types of sweeteners:
- Nutritional Sweeteners: Strong association with increased EC risk, likely due to mechanisms related to obesity, insulin resistance, and hormonal imbalance.
- Non-Nutritional Sweeteners: No clear link to EC risk, suggesting they might be a safer alternative in terms of EC risk, although the evidence remains inconclusive.
Discussion
The results underscore the importance of dietary choices in relation to endometrial cancer risk. The distinction between nutritional and non-nutritional sweeteners is crucial, as they appear to have different impacts on EC risk. Nutritional sweeteners, which are energy-providing, were associated with a higher risk, potentially through pathways related to obesity and metabolic dysfunction.
Recommendations
Given the growing evidence, reducing the intake of nutritional sweeteners could be a prudent measure to mitigate the risk of EC. However, while non-nutritional sweeteners did not increase EC risk, further research is necessary to fully understand their long-term health impacts.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis highlights significant associations between sweetener type and endometrial cancer risk, emphasizing the need for public health strategies to address dietary sugar intake as a modifiable risk factor for EC.
References
- Li H, Zhang Y, He Y, Huang J, Yao J, Zhuang X. Association between consumption of sweeteners and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Br J Nutr. 2024 Jan 14;131(1):63-72. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523001484. Epub 2023 Jul 10. PMID: 37424288.
- Manavalan D, Shubrook C, Young CF. Consumption of Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: What Do We Know, and Not? Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Dec 13;21(12):53. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01422-3. PMID: 34902074.
- Qurrat-ul-Ain, Khan SA. Artificial sweeteners: safe or unsafe? J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Feb;65(2):225-7. PMID: 25842566.
- Position of the American Dietetic Association: appropriate use of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987 Dec;87(12):1689-94. PMID: 3119690.
- Bär A, Biermann C. Intake of intense sweeteners in Germany. Z Ernahrungswiss. 1992 Mar;31(1):25-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01612550. PMID: 1374988.
